The Democrats are the most racist, privileged, sexist and bigoted group of voters - ever seen.
After espousing they are the party of inclusivity and diversity, based on the skin pigmentation, the biological sex, the gender identity, the sexual preferences and of "eradicating corrupt Washington and the rich", we now have the choice of :
one very old white very rich male from the Washington of almost 50 years
Or
another even older white very wealthy white male from Washington of almost 40 years, and has only worked as a politician.
We have Elizabeth Warren, who claims she was sidelined becuase of either her gender identity or her biological sex - same difference i guess. Similar to Kamarla Harris. Which is interesting that the Democrats didn't cheer when Sara Palin was the running mate of Mccain in 2008 or when Condelessa Rice was the first black female as Secretary of State.
We have Cory Booker claiming he was sidelined becuase he was black. Which is odd, given America had 8 years of a black president.
We had a hispanic, in Julian Castro demanding "transgender abortion justice", whatever that is.
We had a $60 Bilionaire spending $600M on trying to win votes. He lost.
We had Elizabeth Warren accusing Bloomberg of telling his female staff to have an abortion. Which is odd, given Warren supports abortion, doesn't see a fetus as a human (obviously) and wouldn't vote to make it mandatory that babies born post abortion that are alive, are kept alive.
To top it off Elizabeth Warren, claimed to be Cherokee, so much so she got a DNA test. It came back 1/1024 part Cherokee, which is less than the average American.
Now we have 2 very old men, one who is not quite sure where he is and the other who has never had a job not funded by other taxpayers, and now has 3 houses and is a millionaire.
Both are Washington establishment collectively of 70+ years.
The Democrats ran on being diverse and inclusive, anti wealthy, anti corrupt Washington, anti bigoted.
How else do you explain their current choices? Perhaps their policies do not make sense? Perhaps mandatorily taking things and rights away from others, in the pursuit of equal outcomes, a.k.a socialism, is a proven failure?
Perhaps stating that a 9 year old trans kid is going to determine who gets awarded the Secretary of Education, is a dumb idea?
Clearly they have proved themselves to be Clinton's 'deplorables'.
Sunday, March 8, 2020
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment